DIALECTICA HEGELIANA PDF

Sign in Create an account. Syntax Advanced Search. About us. Editorial team. Oscar Daniel Brauer.

Author:Arashisar Nigor
Country:Mozambique
Language:English (Spanish)
Genre:Sex
Published (Last):17 September 2012
Pages:177
PDF File Size:9.26 Mb
ePub File Size:19.58 Mb
ISBN:764-8-92338-396-7
Downloads:46834
Price:Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]
Uploader:Jukus



Dialectic resembles debate , but the concept excludes subjective elements such as emotional appeal and the modern pejorative sense of rhetoric. Dialectic is alternatively known as minor logic , as opposed to major logic or critique. Within Hegelianism , the word dialectic has the specialised meaning of a contradiction between ideas that serves as the determining factor in their relationship.

Dialectic comprises three stages of development : first, the thesis , a statement of an idea; second, the antithesis , a reaction that contradicts or negates the thesis; and third, the synthesis , a statement through which the differences between the two points are resolved.

Dialectical materialism , a theory or set of theories produced mainly by Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels , adapted the Hegelian dialectic into arguments regarding traditional materialism. Dialectic tends to imply a process of evolution and so does not naturally fit within formal logic see logic and dialectic. This process is particularly marked in Hegelian dialectic, and even more so in Marxist dialectic, which may rely on the evolution of ideas over longer time periods in the real world; dialectical logic attempts to address this.

The outcome of such a dialectic might be the refutation of a relevant proposition, or of a synthesis, or a combination of the opposing assertions, or a qualitative improvement of the dialogue. Moreover, the term "dialectic" owes much of its prestige to its role in the philosophies of Socrates and Plato , in the Greek Classical period 5th to 4th centuries BCE. Aristotle said that it was the pre-Socratic philosopher Zeno of Elea who invented dialectic, of which the dialogues of Plato are the examples of the Socratic dialectical method.

According to Kant , however, the ancient Greeks used the word "dialectic" to signify the logic of false appearance or semblance.

To the Ancients, "it was nothing but the logic of illusion. It was a sophistic art of giving to one's ignorance, indeed even to one's intentional tricks, the outward appearance of truth, by imitating the thorough, accurate method which logic always requires, and by using its topic as a cloak for every empty assertion. The Socratic dialogues are a particular form of dialectic known as the method of elenchus literally, "refutation, scrutiny" [7] whereby a series of questions clarifies a more precise statement of a vague belief, logical consequences of that statement are explored, and a contradiction is discovered.

The method is largely destructive, in that false belief is exposed [8] and only constructive in that this exposure may lead to further search for truth. The detection of error does not amount to a proof of the antithesis; for example, a contradiction in the consequences of a definition of piety does not provide a correct definition.

The principal aim of Socratic activity may be to improve the soul of the interlocutors, by freeing them from unrecognized errors; or indeed, by teaching them the spirit of inquiry. In common cases, Socrates used enthymemes as the foundation of his argument. For example, in the Euthyphro , Socrates asks Euthyphro to provide a definition of piety. Euthyphro replies that the pious is that which is loved by the gods. But, Socrates also has Euthyphro agreeing that the gods are quarrelsome and their quarrels, like human quarrels, concern objects of love or hatred.

Therefore, Socrates reasons, at least one thing exists that certain gods love but other gods hate. Again, Euthyphro agrees. Socrates concludes that if Euthyphro's definition of piety is acceptable, then there must exist at least one thing that is both pious and impious as it is both loved and hated by the gods —which Euthyphro admits is absurd.

Thus, Euthyphro is brought to a realization by this dialectical method that his definition of piety is not sufficiently meaningful. Because Socrates' ultimate goal was to reach true knowledge, he was even willing to change his own views in order to arrive at the truth. The fundamental goal of dialectic, in this instance, was to establish a precise definition of the subject in this case, rhetoric and with the use of argumentation and questioning, make the subject even more precise.

In the Gorgias, Socrates reaches the truth by asking a series of questions and in return, receiving short, clear answers. There is another interpretation of dialectic, suggested in The Republic , as a procedure that is both discursive and intuitive. The philosopher is consequently a "dialectician". It slowly embraces the multiplicity in unity. Simon Blackburn writes that the dialectic in this sense is used to understand "the total process of enlightenment, whereby the philosopher is educated so as to achieve knowledge of the supreme good, the Form of the Good".

Aristotle stresses that rhetoric is closely related to dialectic. In saying that rhetoric is a counterpart to dialectic, Aristotle obviously alludes to Plato's Gorgias bff. The analogy to dialectic has important implications for the status of rhetoric. Logic, which could be considered to include dialectic, was one of the three liberal arts taught in medieval universities as part of the trivium ; the other elements were rhetoric and grammar. Based mainly on Aristotle , the first medieval philosopher to work on dialectics was Boethius — The concept of dialectics was given new life by Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel following Johann Gottlieb Fichte , whose dialectically synthetic model of nature and of history made it, as it were, a fundamental aspect of the nature of reality instead of regarding the contradictions into which dialectics leads as a sign of the sterility of the dialectical method, as Immanuel Kant tended to do in his Critique of Pure Reason.

It would also become a crucial part of later representations of Marxism as a philosophy of dialectical materialism. These representations often contrasted dramatically [25] and led to vigorous debate among different Marxist groupings, leading some prominent Marxists to give up on the idea of dialectics completely. Although this model is often named after Hegel, he himself never used that specific formulation.

Hegel ascribed that terminology to Kant. On the other hand, Hegel did use a three-valued logical model that is very similar to the antithesis model, but Hegel's most usual terms were: Abstract-Negative-Concrete. Hegel used this writing model as a backbone to accompany his points in many of his works. The formula, thesis-antithesis-synthesis, does not explain why the thesis requires an antithesis.

However, the formula, abstract-negative-concrete, suggests a flaw, or perhaps an incompleteness, in any initial thesis—it is too abstract and lacks the negative of trial, error, and experience. For Hegel, the concrete, the synthesis, the absolute, must always pass through the phase of the negative, in the journey to completion, that is, mediation. This is the essence of what is popularly called Hegelian dialectics.

According to the German philosopher Walter Kaufmann :. Fichte introduced into German philosophy the three-step of thesis, antithesis, and synthesis, using these three terms. Schelling took up this terminology. Hegel did not. He never once used these three terms together to designate three stages in an argument or account in any of his books. And they do not help us understand his Phenomenology , his Logic , or his philosophy of history; they impede any open-minded comprehension of what he does by forcing it into a scheme which was available to him and which he deliberately spurned [ Kaufmann also cites Hegel's criticism of the triad model commonly misattributed to him, adding that "the only place where Hegel uses the three terms together occurs in his lectures on the history of philosophy, on the last page but one of the sections on Kant—where Hegel roundly reproaches Kant for having 'everywhere posited thesis, antithesis, synthesis'".

To describe the activity of overcoming the negative, Hegel also often used the term Aufhebung , variously translated into English as "sublation" or "overcoming", to conceive of the working of the dialectic.

Roughly, the term indicates preserving the useful portion of an idea, thing, society, etc. Jacques Derrida 's preferred French translation of the term was relever. In the Logic , for instance, Hegel describes a dialectic of existence : first, existence must be posited as pure Being Sein ; but pure Being, upon examination, is found to be indistinguishable from Nothing Nichts.

When it is realized that what is coming into being is, at the same time, also returning to nothing in life, for example, one's living is also a dying , both Being and Nothing are united as Becoming. As in the Socratic dialectic, Hegel claimed to proceed by making implicit contradictions explicit: each stage of the process is the product of contradictions inherent or implicit in the preceding stage. For Hegel, the whole of history is one tremendous dialectic, major stages of which chart a progression from self-alienation as slavery to self-unification and realization as the rational constitutional state of free and equal citizens.

The Hegelian dialectic cannot be mechanically applied for any chosen thesis. Critics argue that the selection of any antithesis, other than the logical negation of the thesis, is subjective.

Then, if the logical negation is used as the antithesis, there is no rigorous way to derive a synthesis. In practice, when an antithesis is selected to suit the user's subjective purpose, the resulting "contradictions" are rhetorical , not logical, and the resulting synthesis is not rigorously defensible against a multitude of other possible syntheses.

The problem with the Fichtean "thesis—antithesis—synthesis" model is that it implies that contradictions or negations come from outside of things. Hegel's point is that they are inherent in and internal to things. This conception of dialectics derives ultimately from Heraclitus.

Hegel stated that the purpose of dialectics is "to study things in their own being and movement and thus to demonstrate the finitude of the partial categories of understanding. One important dialectical principal for Hegel is the transition from quantity to quality, which he terms the Measure.

The measure is the qualitative quantum, the quantum is the existence of quantity. The identity between quantity and quality, which is found in Measure, is at first only implicit, and not yet explicitly realised. In other words, these two categories, which unite in Measure, each claim an independent authority.

On the one hand, the quantitative features of existence may be altered, without affecting its quality. On the other hand, this increase and diminution, immaterial though it be, has its limit, by exceeding which the quality suffers change.

This however is not a negation of quality altogether, but only of this definite quality, the place of which is at once occupied by another. This process of measure, which appears alternately as a mere change in quantity, and then as a sudden revulsion of quantity into quality, may be envisaged under the figure of a nodal knotted line. As an example, Hegel mentions the states of aggregation of water: "Thus the temperature of water is, in the first place, a point of no consequence in respect of its liquidity: still with the increase or diminution of the temperature of the liquid water, there comes a point where this state of cohesion suffers a qualitative change, and the water is converted into steam or ice".

Another important principle for Hegel is the negation of the negation, which he also terms Aufhebung sublation : Something is only what it is in its relation to another, but by the negation of the negation this something incorporates the other into itself.

The dialectical movement involves two moments that negate each other, something and its other. As a result of the negation of the negation, "something becomes its other; this other is itself something; therefore it likewise becomes an other, and so on ad infinitum".

What is sublated aufgehoben on the one hand ceases to be and is put to an end, but on the other hand it is preserved and maintained.

Marxist dialectic is a form of Hegelian dialectic which applies to the study of historical materialism. It purports to be a reflection of the real world created by man. Dialectic would thus be a robust method under which one could examine personal, social, and economic behaviors.

Marxist dialectic is the core foundation of the philosophy of dialectical materialism , which forms the basis of the ideas behind historical materialism. Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels proposed that Hegel's dialectic is too abstract:.

The mystification which dialectic suffers in Hegel's hands, by no means prevents him from being the first to present its general form of working in a comprehensive and conscious manner.

With him it is standing on its head. It must be turned right side up again, if you would discover the rational kernel within the mystical shell. In contradiction to Hegelian idealism, Marx presented his own dialectic method, which he claims to be "direct opposite" of Hegel's method:. My dialectic method is not only different from the Hegelian, but is its direct opposite.

To Hegel, the life-process of the human brain, i. With me, on the contrary, the ideal is nothing else than the material world reflected by the human mind, and translated into forms of thought. In Marxism, the dialectical method of historical study became intertwined with historical materialism , the school of thought exemplified by the works of Marx, Engels, and Vladimir Lenin.

In the USSR, under Joseph Stalin , Marxist dialectics became "diamat" short for dialectical materialism , a theory emphasizing the primacy of the material way of life; social "praxis" over all forms of social consciousness; and the secondary, dependent character of the "ideal". The term "dialectical materialism" was coined by the 19th-century social theorist Joseph Dietzgen who used the theory to explain the nature of socialism and social development.

The original populariser of Marxism in Russia, Georgi Plekhanov used the terms "dialectical materialism" and "historical materialism" interchangeably.

AISLINN KERRY PDF

Hegel’s Dialectics

Slideshare uses cookies to improve functionality and performance, and to provide you with relevant advertising. If you continue browsing the site, you agree to the use of cookies on this website. See our User Agreement and Privacy Policy. See our Privacy Policy and User Agreement for details.

BSS DPR 504 PDF

La estructura de la dialéctica hegeliana

Dialectic resembles debate , but the concept excludes subjective elements such as emotional appeal and the modern pejorative sense of rhetoric. Dialectic is alternatively known as minor logic , as opposed to major logic or critique. Within Hegelianism , the word dialectic has the specialised meaning of a contradiction between ideas that serves as the determining factor in their relationship. Dialectic comprises three stages of development : first, the thesis , a statement of an idea; second, the antithesis , a reaction that contradicts or negates the thesis; and third, the synthesis , a statement through which the differences between the two points are resolved. Dialectical materialism , a theory or set of theories produced mainly by Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels , adapted the Hegelian dialectic into arguments regarding traditional materialism. Dialectic tends to imply a process of evolution and so does not naturally fit within formal logic see logic and dialectic. This process is particularly marked in Hegelian dialectic, and even more so in Marxist dialectic, which may rely on the evolution of ideas over longer time periods in the real world; dialectical logic attempts to address this.

Related Articles